45 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
The narrator provides Galina’s monologue at the station as Annushka overhears it. Galina argues for the sanctity of movement. If one were to stop moving, society and its expectations would take control of one’s mind; one would be consumed with thoughts of capitalism and its suffocating institutions.
The narrator switches to a third letter from Josefine Soliman to Emperor Francis I about the remains of her father. It has been two years since Josefine wrote her first letter. She begs that her father’s body be returned to her for burial: “[A]s a Catholic I believe that without his body he will not be able to be resurrected in the Last Judgment” (262). She proposes that the emperor’s motives are racist and argues that institutions like the monarchy exercise their power primarily over bodies; as emperor, Francis’s actions decide “which bodies will be important” and therefore treated with respect (264). She demands the emperor acknowledge her father’s equality and return his body.
The narrator recounts vignettes of her travels through southern islands of the eastern hemisphere. A woman from one of these small islands is no longer allowed to donate blood in her country because she has traveled extensively in Europe and has therefore been exposed to novel pathogens. The narrator views a curiosities exhibit where she recognizes the preservation techniques of Charlotta, Ruysch’s daughter.
The narrator returns to Europe and travels to Rome, where she becomes obsessed with the images she sees on postcards and how they have changed over her years of travel. These postcards focus on small, specific details of the city’s landscape: “There is too much world, so it’s better to concentrate on particulars, rather than the whole” (267). She feels as if the postcards direct what she should admire about Rome.
Beached whales in Australia consume the media’s attention while the narrator is there. Some people describe this phenomenon as the whale committing suicide; animal rights activists protest forcing these whales back into the water against their presumed wishes. Volunteers throw water on the whales during the several days it typically takes for them to die. In some cases, the whale returns to the water on its own. The narrator notes how hunters often kill the whales that do make it back to sea.
The narrator tells the fictional story of a biologist returning to Warsaw to administer a lethal pill to her terminally ill former lover. The biologist first received an email from him around Christmas. She was shocked to hear from this man after 30 years and could only focus on her work, which involves eliminating pests along coastal regions through directed poisons.
She began corresponding with her former lover, who eventually revealed that he was planning his own suicide. The couple had attended a scientific high school in Poland but separated when the biologist’s parents chose to leave the country to evade communist rule; he never joined her, although—as his emails note—they had promised to see each other again. Reading his emails, the biologist considered their relationship in the context of biological theories on interdependency: “Living organisms give themselves to one another, permit one another to make use of them” (286). She decided to see her lover again and lied to her husband, claiming she would be attending a scientific conference in Europe.
The biologist lives in Australia or an island with similarly strict biocontamination legislation in association with travel; she must go through several procedures before boarding the plane. She arrives in Poland during the worst of winter. Her former lover is a divorced, disgraced political figure. His sister cares for him, and the biologist meets her when she finally arrives at the lover’s home. Because of his pain medication, the lover struggles to recognize and then interact with the biologist.
Eventually, the lover is able to ask after the biologist’s work preserving the ecosystem of her island through poison. They agree that she will give him a lethal injection the next day without telling his sister. The biologist switches her flight to Amsterdam for the next day, unwilling to stay in her birthplace much longer. The next day, she arrives at her lover’s home. She puts a morphine patch on him. When he relaxes into sleep, she injects him with the poison, and he dies peacefully.
The biologist travels to Amsterdam and consciously forgets what happened: “All those memories now disappear” (305). She visits an anatomical exhibit when in Amsterdam and then flies home, where she must confess to the customs office that she has been exposed to biological contaminants.
The narrator recounts an interaction she had with a young man in Serbia. The man, Nebojša, talks of his need for movement and travel as rooted in distrust of the people who have come before him. When he settles somewhere, he begins to wonder about who lived there previously and experiences an irresistible urge to move on.
The narrator describes the Day of the Dead holiday that features continual radio broadcasts of Chopin, mentions a man who visits places that contain his deceased wife’s name, and explores her own love for the waiting areas of hotel lobbies. For her, life is best understood as a cross section in which “each slice is part of the whole, but it’s governed by its own rules” (312). The narrator points out that she will eventually need to settle somewhere permanently and wonders what it is she is searching for in the cities she visits.
The narrator begins a fictional story about the pianist Fryderyk Chopin. He dies in late 1849, having already made funeral and burial arrangements. His sister, Ludwika, oversees these requests. Chopin’s face and hands are preserved in plaster, and his heart is removed for preservation. The first funeral is held in Paris at La Madeleine, a prestigious Catholic church. Chopin requested that Mozart’s Requiem be played at the funeral, but as this piece requires female singers and La Madeleine does not allow women to perform, Ludwika encounters problems. Eventually a compromise is reached, largely thanks to the persistence of the actress hired to sing. This inspires Ludwika to take drastic action to fulfill her brother’s wish to have his heart buried in their birthplace of Poland. She smuggles the jar containing his heart under her skirt across the Polish border.
The narrator continues to describe her travel in fragments, highlighting her experiences when living off the grid, encountering another Polish speaker in a video store, and staying at a hotel in which the key for Room Nine is continually lost. She is given this same key and, though she tries not to lose it, discovers that she accidentally takes it with her when she checks out of the hotel.
Galina’s speech reflects the narrator’s concern with the temptation society poses; the narrator believes that if one stops moving, then one risks becoming so distracted by the vapid consumption inherent to capitalism that future movement becomes impossible (258-60). The narrator’s desire for movement can therefore be viewed as an escape plan; the novel’s title, Flights, represents both its narrative structure (fragments written during travel, including during literal airplane flights) and the way that the narrator uses travel to flee from the demands of capitalist society.
The narrator discusses the figurative price of travel with a woman from an island with strict laws against biological containments. Because this woman chose to travel, she cannot donate blood when she returns home. The narrator’s discussion with this woman reflects the often alienating effects of travel and its tendency to separate an individual from societal duties (such as donating blood to those in need). In the biologist’s vignette, the narrator creates a character who comes from an island similar to this woman’s and whose theory of human interdependence speaks directly to these concerns. The biologist explains that, in evolutionary terms, we allow others to make use of ourselves: Our presence in a functioning society requires some degree of personal sacrifice. However, these sacrifices will not be border-specific much longer: “You have to make peace with the fact that in the end there won’t be individual ecosystems. The world all sloshed together in a single sludge” (297). The biologist does not worry about bringing potential contaminants into her country because she does not believe that interdependency can coexist with socially constructed borders. In the end, these borders will dissolve, allowing for movement and true interdependency among all people.
The narrator expands upon this idea of interdependency in her fragment on cross sections. The “slices” that are indicative of the whole reflect her narrative style, with each fragment or fictional vignette contributing to the “whole” of the narrator and her social context. Though the fragments and fictional writing are themselves separated by distinct boundaries, these boundaries thus dissolve during the reading process. They do not exist as “individual ecosystems,” as the biologist says, but rather as cross sections of the larger work of narrative.
Unlock all 45 pages of this Study Guide
Plus, gain access to 9,150+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By these authors
Books & Literature
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
National Book Awards Winners & Finalists
View Collection
Nobel Laureates in Literature
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Popular Study Guides
View Collection
The Booker Prizes Awardees & Honorees
View Collection